Diabetic nephropathy 'faculty'
Attended an industry-sponsored faculty meeting to talk about diabetic nephropathy at the Vale of Glamorgan hotel. The aim was to come up with some form of consensus on blood pressure targets, and the role of various antihypertensives but it drifted into a lot of other aspects including glycaemic control in nephropathy, the forthcoming Renal NSF and so on.
Choice of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) for the treatment and prevention of diabetic nephropathy in Type 2 diabetes was discussed. (ACE inhibitors have more evidence in Type 1 Diabetes and, perhaps, should be favoured in Type 2 Diabetes where there is coronary heart disease or LVF). The ARB candidates for Type 2 Diabetes are losartan (RENAAL study), irbesartan (IDNT, IRMA-2 studies) and valsartan (MARVAL study) but only losartan and irbesartan have licenses for this indication. All seem to have benefits over and above absolute blood pressure control but the studies are difficult to directly compare. (ARB trials summary table).
It looks like the MDRD formula for calculating GFR will be adopted in Wales. The pathology labs will report it routinely with every serum creatinine measurement. When the reporting starts there may be an increased referral from primary care for patients with normal(ish) serum creatinine but who now have renal impairment on calculated GFR. This leads to some tricky questions.
- What level of GFR should be referred to secondary care?
- Which is more important, the absolute level or change in GFR?
- At what level of GFR would we advise against the use of metformin?

